🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart atomic discussions with the United States provided that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated only diplomacy worked, and disclosed fresh requests had originated from go-betweens to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Course

The foreign minister is treading a complex route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be operating from a position of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more resilient in military terms and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will never give up" – the main reason of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader asserting the sites had been obliterated. Subsequently, Western states exercised their authority to reimpose international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with American involvement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Representatives stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Status

Iran's diplomats declared the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the proposal could be resurrected in certain ways if negotiations reopen.

Trump recently claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from Washington either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of inactivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran states diplomacy is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Stance

In his speech to the forum, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be resolved by combat operations. He stated the assaults started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with complete American awareness and cooperation, making trust hard to rebuild.

Negotiations Remains the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had consistently sought to enforce their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the primary resolution to settle disagreements, but its requirements, guidelines and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and honor, they will obtain a answer in the equivalent tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have become more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the administration and the state in the wake of this attack."