🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam decision, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to implement a revised congressional map that could add several five new Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to set aside a district court's block that had invalidated the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating much confusion and disturbing the fine equilibrium in elections, the order stated in detailing its action.

That lower court had determined that Texas had likely classified voters by their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the boundaries. It had ordered the state to employ the maps established after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Stinging Opposition

With a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's decision. She contended that it undermined the work of the district court, observing that its ruling was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its increased political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a breach of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

The court's action occurs during a national contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican control. Ordinarily, map-drawing happens after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a series of events among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that might create several more Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have responded with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas attorney general hailed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees representation favorable to the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

On the other hand, Democratic officials criticized the outcome. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major party election organization.

A top Democratic figure stated the court had once again eroded its standing by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.